Freezing Order Lawyer

Mareva Injunctions, Asset Preservation & Emergency Commercial Relief

PREMIUM LEGAL SERVICES

Experienced. Aggressive. Client-Centered

Successful Litigation Cases Handled

0 +

Litigation, Mediation, Trial - Focused

0 %

Years of Combined Legal Experience

0 +

In Handling Complicated Disputes

0 *

Why You Need Legal Help with a Freezing Order

Freezing-order litigation begins where ordinary civil timing is no longer good enough. The problem is not simply that a claim exists. The problem is that money, shares, receivables, crypto, sale proceeds, or other realizable assets may be moved, concealed, dissipated, or restructured beyond practical reach before the court can determine the merits.

That is why freezing-order work must be approached as preservation litigation, not generic injunction practice. In Ontario, interlocutory injunctions remain governed procedurally by Rule 40 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and substantively by section 101 of the Courts of Justice Act. Rule 40 continues to permit interlocutory relief in a pending or intended proceeding, allows without-notice orders only for short periods subject to extension rules, and requires an undertaking as to damages unless the court orders otherwise. Section 101 continues to authorize interlocutory injunctions, mandatory orders, and receivers where it appears just or convenient to do so.

A freezing order lawyer in Toronto must therefore do more than draft an urgent motion record. Counsel must determine whether the real risk is dissipation, concealment, diversion, or structural insulation; whether the right first step is a Mareva injunction, a receiver, tracing relief, or a related disclosure tool; whether without-notice relief is justified; and whether the requested order is strong enough to preserve value without becoming so broad that it cannot survive scrutiny on the return of the motion.

These cases commonly arise in fraud claims, fiduciary-duty disputes, shareholder and oppression proceedings, post-closing conflicts, confidential-information disputes, and other high-stakes business litigation where recoverability is under immediate threat. The practical objective is not merely to obtain a dramatic order. It is to preserve the asset base, stabilize the dispute, and protect the client’s ability to enforce a future judgment in a meaningful way.

Years of
combined
legal
experience

0
ME Law - Civil Litigation Law Firm

WHO WE ARE

ME Law is a litigation-only firm that acts in urgent commercial injunctions, Mareva injunctions, and freezing-order applications across Toronto and Ontario.

We are retained when the stakes have moved beyond liability and into recoverability: when a founder, principal, debtor, counterparty, fiduciary, or business adversary appears to be moving assets; when value may be leaving the jurisdiction or passing through affiliates; when a governance conflict is accelerating into asset diversion; or when a claimant needs decisive preservation relief before ordinary litigation timing makes the case commercially hollow.

Our role is not merely to seek an order freezing assets. It is to assess the true risk landscape, marshal the evidentiary record with speed and discipline, design a workable preservation order, and align the interim relief with the broader litigation and enforcement strategy that follows.

Whether the underlying dispute involves fraud, misappropriation, breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder oppression, corporate-governance conflict, post-transaction misconduct, confidential-information misuse, or a broader recovery-driven commercial claim, we bring legal rigor and commercial judgment to the problem.

How We Help

Civil Litigation Services

From commercial disputes and estate conflicts to defamation and business sabotage, we protect our clients through immediate legal intervention.
ME Law is a litigation-only firm with extensive experience handling interlocutory injunctions in commercial, real estate, employment, and property disputes. Litigation is all we do.
Why Choose Us

Premium Litigation Services:

Quality over quantity for selected clients in complex litigation matters

Selective Focus

We act for a select group of clients in high-stakes litigation, dedicating focused time and strategic attention to each matter to ensure precise, results-driven advocacy.

Limited Caseload

By limiting our caseload, we provide bespoke, high-level representation, where no detail is overlooked and every legal step is carefully considered. Quality over quantity is embedded in our ethos.

Strategic Execution

Our limited-file approach enables us to deliver thorough, strategic legal work on every matter. We don’t offer surface-level service – we provide clarity, focus, and substance.

Beyond Expectations

Our lawyers invest considerable time in legal analysis, research, and continuous training. This ongoing development allows us to stay ahead and deliver outcomes that often exceed clients’ expectations.

Clients’ Success Stories

Our cases

Hidden Assets Revealed in Estate Dispute Victory

Cross-Border Defence Win: Court Rules in Our Client’s Favor

May Elajami Secures Critical Ex Parte Interim Injunction

Strategic Mediation and Successful Defence in High-Stakes Litigation

Skillfully Navigated Personal Conflicts in Corporate Disputes

Safeguarding a Minor’s Inheritance Rights

How We Work

What To Expect

Clear and Strategic Guidance

Transparent and well-informed advice is provided to help navigate your options and achieve the best possible outcome.

Proactive Client Engagement

Clients can expect consistent communication and dedicated attention to ensure their needs are fully understood and addressed.

Meticulous Attention to Details

Every detail is carefully considered, and strategic oversight is provided to guide clients toward a favorable resolution.

Experienced. Strategic. Results-Oriented.

Freezing orders are among the most exacting forms of interlocutory relief in commercial litigation. They are powerful because they can materially reshape the litigation landscape at the outset. They are exacting because they are intrusive, urgent, and closely scrutinized. They require speed, but not haste; aggression, but not overreach; precision, but not timidity.

The governing Canadian principles remain clear. In Aetna Financial Services v. Feigelman, the Supreme Court of Canada treated Mareva relief as an exceptional remedy aimed at freezing exigible assets within the jurisdiction where there is a justiciable cause of action and a genuine risk of disappearance of assets. In RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), the Court articulated the familiar interlocutory-injunction framework that continues to shape urgent relief analysis more broadly. Those authorities remain foundational to serious asset-preservation work.

At ME Law, we act in freezing-order matters arising from fraud, civil conspiracy, fiduciary misconduct, corporate-opportunity diversion, shareholder and oppression disputes, dissipation of sale proceeds, earn-out conflicts, asset stripping, and other commercial disputes where the recoverable asset base may be deteriorating in real time. Our focus is always the same: preserve value, prevent strategic dissipation, and improve the client’s practical enforcement position before the merits process runs its full course.

Where the dispute is sufficiently complex, urgent, or enterprise-critical, Toronto Commercial List discipline may also matter. The current Toronto Region Consolidated Practice Direction, effective October 14, 2025, continues to include a dedicated Commercial List section and remains a relevant procedural framework for complex commercial matters in Toronto.

Freezing-order work also rarely stands alone. In the right case, it sits alongside tracing strategy, receivership analysis, disclosure applications, preservation of documentary evidence, and early thinking about how the eventual judgment will actually be enforced. That is why the strongest freezing-order counsel do not approach the motion as an isolated event. They approach it as the first move in a broader recovery architecture.

FREEZING ORDER LAWYERS YOU CAN RELY ON

We represent claimants, companies, boards, investors, family offices, lenders, and stakeholders seeking urgent asset-preservation relief in high-stakes commercial disputes. That includes Mareva injunctions, without-notice freezing-order motions, return motions, variation motions, related tracing strategy, preservation relief in shareholder and oppression litigation, and emergency applications in fraud, fiduciary-duty, and asset-diversion cases.

Our team understands that sophisticated clients are not looking for procedural theatre. They are looking for counsel who can identify when freezing relief is genuinely warranted, move quickly enough to matter, and frame the order in a way that preserves value without compromising the long-term case. That requires judgment about evidence, timing, scope, return-motion risk, commercial optics, and the downstream enforcement objective.

Commercial injunction and emergency litigation are core areas of our practice. We know how to assess dissipation risk, how to structure urgent injunction records, how to integrate freezing relief with receivership and tracing strategy, and how to position the matter so that interim success contributes to — rather than distracts from — the client’s ultimate recovery. Where the underlying dispute is corporate in nature, Ontario’s Business Corporations Act continues to provide an oppression remedy in section 248 and broad interim and final remedial authority, which can become highly relevant where asset movement is tied to shareholder or governance misconduct.

Our Commitment

We approach freezing-order litigation with precision, discretion, and resolve. Our role is not simply to ask the court to freeze assets. It is to identify what must be preserved, why it is truly at risk, how the order should be framed, and what additional steps may be necessary to convert interim protection into meaningful recovery leverage.

Where appropriate, that may include a Mareva injunction, related injunctive relief, a receiver or receiver-manager under section 101, tracing-oriented relief, return-motion advocacy, or broader emergency commercial litigation strategy. We act with urgency where the facts justify it, but always with close attention to the evidentiary record, the undertaking as to damages, the durability of the order, and the broader litigation consequences of the relief sought.

With us on your side, a strong claim need not become a commercially empty one because assets were permitted to disappear before judgment.

Mareva Injunctions & Freezing Order Applications
Urgent Without-Notice Asset Preservation Motions
Worldwide Freezing Order & Cross-Border Preservation Strategy
Fraud, Asset Diversion & Dissipation Response
Freezing Relief in Shareholder, Oppression & Governance Disputes
Freezing Relief in Fiduciary Duty & Corporate Opportunity Cases
Receivership, Receiver-Manager & Court-Supervised Preservation Relief
Tracing, Asset Identification & Recovery Strategy
Norwich, Disclosure & Information-Gathering Support for Preservation Motions
Anton Piller & Evidence-Preservation Relief in Emergency Cases
Post-Closing, Earn-Out & Transaction-Related Asset-Freezing Disputes
Return Motions, Variation Motions & Ongoing Freezing-Order Management

Clear Guidance. Strong Advocacy.

What we do:
Let us solve your legal issue

Years
Experience

0 +

Successful
Cases

0 +

Main Areas of
Specialization

0 +

Dedication to
Your Case

0 +
Reach out to us today
Frequently Asked Questions

Becoming a Client

How do I start?

The first step is to book a complimentary intake call with one of our intake specialists. During this initial conversation, we’ll gather some preliminary details about your matter, identify the nature of the dispute, and determine whether it falls within our areas of practice.

If we believe we can assist, we’ll then proceed with a conflict check to ensure there are no conflicts of interest under the Law Society of Ontario’s Rules of Professional Conduct. Once cleared, we can schedule a consultation with one of our lawyers, where we will review your situation in more detail, discuss potential legal strategies, and outline next steps for formal engagement.

This process ensures that every inquiry is handled carefully, ethically, and efficiently—so that we can provide you with informed guidance right from the outset.

Can you explain the typical steps involved?

Our process is designed to be clear, efficient, and transparent from start to finish.

  1. Initial Intake Call:
    We begin with a complimentary intake call to understand the general nature of your matter, confirm it falls within our areas of practice, and gather preliminary information.
  2. Conflict Check:
    Before receiving any detailed or confidential information, we conduct a conflict of interest check as required by the Law Society of Ontario. This ensures we can represent you without any professional conflicts.
  3. Consultation with a Lawyer:
    Once cleared, we schedule a formal consultation — either in person or remotely — where we review your situation in detail, answer your questions, and outline preliminary legal options or next steps.
  4. Retainer and Engagement:
    If you decide to proceed, we provide a Retainer Agreement outlining the scope of work, estimated costs, and billing structure. Upon execution and receipt of the retainer, we officially open your file.
  5. Case Strategy and Next Steps:
    Your lawyer will then prepare a strategy plan and begin working on your matter — whether that involves drafting pleadings, engaging in negotiations, or preparing for court proceedings — while keeping you informed throughout.

At every stage, we emphasize clarity, communication, and transparency so you always know what to expect and how your case is progressing.

Why is it necessary to complete a conflict check form after the initial call?

Efforts to avoid conflicts of interest are required by the Law Society of Ontario and form a fundamental part of legal ethics and professional regulation.

A conflict check ensures that our firm has never represented—or is not currently representing—any party whose interests may be adverse to yours. This process protects both you and our firm by confirming that we can act for you with full independence and loyalty.

The duty to avoid conflicts applies to past, current, and prospective clients and is set out in the Rules of Professional Conduct (the Model Code) as well as by decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada, including R. v. Neil and Canadian National Railway Co. v. McKercher LLP.

In practice, we conduct conflict checks before receiving detailed information about your matter. This step is an essential safeguard to uphold professional integrity and client trust.

How quickly can you schedule an initial call with a lawyer?

In most cases, we can schedule your consultation within 24–48 hours after completing the initial intake and conflict check process. This ensures that your matter is properly screened and assigned to the most suitable lawyer on our team.

To learn more about what happens next — from intake to engagement — please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section, where we’ve outlined each step in detail and answered the most common questions new clients have.

What clients say about us

Reviews &
Testimonials

Facing a Legal Challenge?

Take control of the situation with expert legal advice. Contact us today to explore your best options and protect your interests.

Commercial Litigation