Urgent Injunctions in Shareholder Disputes

Interim Relief & Emergency Motions in Shareholder Litigation

PREMIUM LEGAL SERVICES

Experienced. Aggressive. Client-Centered

Get Started

Successful Litigation Cases Handled

0 +

Litigation, Mediation, Trial - Focused

0 %

Years of Combined Legal Experience

0 +

In Handling Complicated Disputes

0 *

Why You Need Legal Help with Urgent Injunctions in Shareholder Disputes

Shareholder disputes can escalate rapidly. A sudden share issuance may dilute ownership. Corporate funds may be transferred. Directors may be removed. Related-party transactions may close without notice. In these circumstances, delay can permanently alter control and enterprise value.

An urgent injunction in a shareholder dispute is designed to preserve the status quo and prevent irreparable harm pending final determination. Ontario courts apply the governing framework set out in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 SCR 311, requiring proof of:

A serious issue to be tried;
Irreparable harm if relief is refused; and
A balance of convenience favouring the order.

In oppression proceedings under section 248 of the Ontario Business Corporations Act, interim relief may also be necessary to protect reasonable expectations pending adjudication, consistent with the contextual approach articulated in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, 2008 SCC 69.

Injunctions are discretionary and granted cautiously. Courts require disciplined evidence, urgency, and proportionality. Emergency Commercial List motions demand immediate preparation, strategic affidavit drafting, and precise articulation of harm. Without structured intervention, governance paralysis or asset dissipation can become irreversible.

A skilled shareholder injunction lawyer ensures that urgent relief is pursued—or resisted—with clarity, credibility, and commercial discipline.

Years of
combined
legal
experience

ME Law - Civil Litigation Law Firm

Who We Are

ME Law is a litigation-only firm handling complex shareholder disputes across Ontario, including urgent injunction proceedings before the Commercial List.

We act for founders, investors, directors, and private corporations in emergency motions involving freezing orders, dilution restraint applications, interim governance controls, and asset preservation orders. We represent both applicants seeking urgent court intervention and respondents defending against overbroad or unwarranted interim relief.

Our objective is precise: preserve enterprise value, protect governance rights, and ensure that interim relief aligns with established judicial standards.

Click to watch video

How We Help

CIVIL LITIGATION SERVICES

Forced Share Buy-Outs & Court-Engineered Exits

When co-ownership becomes untenable, courts may impose structured exits. Forced share buy-outs and court-ordered remedies are powerful tools designed to restore fairness, finality, and enterprise stability in high-conflict shareholder disputes.

Oppression & Shareholder Claims in Insolvency

Our lawyers regularly handle disputes involving insolvent or near-insolvent corporations, including claims that overlap with bankruptcy proceedings, receiverships, CCAA restructurings, and creditor enforcement actions.

Shareholder & Partnership Arbitration Lawyers

At ME Law, we represent shareholders, partners, corporate officers, founders, and businesses of all sizes in high-stakes arbitration. We are litigation and arbitration counsel—meaning we are built for disputes, conflicts, and contested matters.

Why Choose Us

Premium Litigation Services:

Quality over quantity for selected clients in complex litigation matters

Selective Focus

We act for a select group of clients in high-stakes litigation, dedicating focused time and strategic attention to each matter to ensure precise, results-driven advocacy.

Limited Caseload

By limiting our caseload, we provide bespoke, high-level representation, where no detail is overlooked and every legal step is carefully considered. Quality over quantity is embedded in our ethos.

Strategic Execution

Our limited-file approach enables us to deliver thorough, strategic legal work on every matter. We don’t offer surface-level service – we provide clarity, focus, and substance.

Beyond Expectations

Our lawyers invest considerable time in legal analysis, research, and continuous training. This ongoing development allows us to stay ahead and deliver outcomes that often exceed clients’ expectations.

Clients’ Success Stories

Our cases

Hidden Assets Revealed in Estate Dispute Victory

Cross-Border Defence Win: Court Rules in Our Client’s Favor

May Elajami Secures Critical Ex Parte Interim Injunction

Strategic Mediation and Successful Defence in High-Stakes Litigation

Skillfully Navigated Personal Conflicts in Corporate Disputes

Safeguarding a Minor’s Inheritance Rights

How We Work

What To Expect

Clear and Strategic Guidance

Transparent and well-informed advice is provided to help navigate your options and achieve the best possible outcome.

Proactive Client Engagement

Clients can expect consistent communication and dedicated attention to ensure their needs are fully understood and addressed.

Meticulous Attention to Details

Every detail is carefully considered, and strategic oversight is provided to guide clients toward a favorable resolution.

Experienced. Effective. Results-Oriented.

Urgent injunction motions frequently determine the trajectory of shareholder litigation. Interim relief can reshape leverage, preserve control, and prevent irreparable harm before trial.

Applications may include Mareva (freezing) orders to preserve corporate assets, dilution restraint injunctions to prevent improper share issuances, interim governance orders maintaining board composition, and emergency Commercial List motions to prevent exclusion or mismanagement.

Courts require clear proof of irreparable harm and a compelling balance of convenience. Interim relief is protective, not punitive. Proportionality governs every order.

At ME Law, we approach urgent injunctions strategically. We identify the precise harm to be prevented, marshal evidence efficiently, and pursue tailored orders designed to stabilize operations and preserve shareholder rights. Where necessary, we also defend against injunction applications that lack evidentiary foundation or exceed proportionate bounds.

Our focus is always on preserving value, enforcing rights, and positioning the dispute advantageously for its ultimate resolution.

SHAREHOLDER INJUNCTION LAWYERS YOU CAN RELY ON

We represent shareholders, directors, and corporations in all forms of urgent injunction motions arising from shareholder disputes.

These matters require rapid assessment, disciplined affidavit preparation, and decisive courtroom advocacy. Timing is critical. Evidence must be immediate, credible, and strategically framed.

Shareholder injunction litigation intersects with oppression claims, valuation disputes, governance conflicts, and exit strategies. By combining courtroom strength with commercial insight, we pursue efficient, enforceable interim solutions that safeguard both financial and strategic interests.

Our Commitment

We approach urgent shareholder litigation with precision, foresight, and restraint. Our role is not only to obtain or defeat interim relief but to preserve the long-term value and strategic position of the business. At ME Law, we combine procedural sophistication with commercial judgment to deliver strategic solutions that protect your investment, enforce your rights, and secure fair results.

With us on your side, emergency shareholder disputes can be addressed decisively and proportionately.

Urgent Injunction Motions in Shareholder Disputes

Mareva (Freezing) Orders

Dilution Restraint Applications

Interim Governance & Board Control Orders

Emergency Commercial List Motions

Oppression-Based Interim Relief

Asset Preservation Applications

Removal or Appointment of Interim Directors

Anton Piller Orders (Document Preservation)

Injunction Defence & Variation Motions

Enforcement of Interim Orders

Strategic Pre-Litigation Asset Protection

Clear Guidance. Strong Advocacy.

What we do:

Let us solve your legal issue

Years
Experience

0 +

Successful
Cases

0 +

Main Areas of
Specialization

0 +

Dedication to
Your Case

0 +

Reach out to us today

Frequently Asked Questions

Becoming a Client

View all faqs

How do I start?

The first step is to book a complimentary intake call with one of our intake specialists. During this initial conversation, we’ll gather some preliminary details about your matter, identify the nature of the dispute, and determine whether it falls within our areas of practice.

If we believe we can assist, we’ll then proceed with a conflict check to ensure there are no conflicts of interest under the Law Society of Ontario’s Rules of Professional Conduct. Once cleared, we can schedule a consultation with one of our lawyers, where we will review your situation in more detail, discuss potential legal strategies, and outline next steps for formal engagement.

This process ensures that every inquiry is handled carefully, ethically, and efficiently—so that we can provide you with informed guidance right from the outset.

Can you explain the typical steps involved?

Our process is designed to be clear, efficient, and transparent from start to finish.

Initial Intake Call:
We begin with a complimentary intake call to understand the general nature of your matter, confirm it falls within our areas of practice, and gather preliminary information.
Conflict Check:
Before receiving any detailed or confidential information, we conduct a conflict of interest check as required by the Law Society of Ontario. This ensures we can represent you without any professional conflicts.
Consultation with a Lawyer:
Once cleared, we schedule a formal consultation — either in person or remotely — where we review your situation in detail, answer your questions, and outline preliminary legal options or next steps.
Retainer and Engagement:
If you decide to proceed, we provide a Retainer Agreement outlining the scope of work, estimated costs, and billing structure. Upon execution and receipt of the retainer, we officially open your file.
Case Strategy and Next Steps:
Your lawyer will then prepare a strategy plan and begin working on your matter — whether that involves drafting pleadings, engaging in negotiations, or preparing for court proceedings — while keeping you informed throughout.

At every stage, we emphasize clarity, communication, and transparency so you always know what to expect and how your case is progressing.

Why is it necessary to complete a conflict check form after the initial call?

Efforts to avoid conflicts of interest are required by the Law Society of Ontario and form a fundamental part of legal ethics and professional regulation.

A conflict check ensures that our firm has never represented—or is not currently representing—any party whose interests may be adverse to yours. This process protects both you and our firm by confirming that we can act for you with full independence and loyalty.

The duty to avoid conflicts applies to past, current, and prospective clients and is set out in the Rules of Professional Conduct (the Model Code) as well as by decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada, including R. v. Neil and Canadian National Railway Co. v. McKercher LLP.

In practice, we conduct conflict checks before receiving detailed information about your matter. This step is an essential safeguard to uphold professional integrity and client trust.

How quickly can you schedule an initial call with a lawyer?

In most cases, we can schedule your consultation within 24–48 hours after completing the initial intake and conflict check process. This ensures that your matter is properly screened and assigned to the most suitable lawyer on our team.

To learn more about what happens next — from intake to engagement — please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section, where we’ve outlined each step in detail and answered the most common questions new clients have.