Director & Officer Liability in Shareholder Litigation

Director & Officer Liability in Corporate and Shareholder Disputes

PREMIUM LEGAL SERVICES

Experienced. Aggressive. Client-Centered

Get Started

Successful Litigation Cases Handled

0 +

Litigation, Mediation, Trial - Focused

0 %

Years of Combined Legal Experience

0 +

In Handling Complicated Disputes

0 *

Why You Need Legal Help with Director & Officer Liability in Shareholder Litigation

Director and officer liability disputes are among the most consequential forms of shareholder litigation. While directors owe fiduciary duties to the corporation—not individual shareholders—their decisions can give rise to personal exposure where statutory and common law obligations are breached.

Under section 134 of the Ontario Business Corporations Act (OBCA), directors and officers must act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation, and exercise the care, diligence, and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. These statutory duties intersect with fiduciary duty principles and the business judgment rule.

Personal liability may arise in derivative actions under section 246 of the OBCA or through oppression proceedings under section 248, particularly where misuse of corporate powers, conflict of interest, diversion of corporate opportunity, or related-party transactions are alleged. The Supreme Court of Canada in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, 2008 SCC 69 clarified that directors must act in the best interests of the corporation as a whole. In Wilson v. Alharayeri, 2017 SCC 39, the Court confirmed that personal liability may be imposed under the oppression remedy where it is a proportionate response to the misconduct established.

These cases require disciplined evidentiary analysis and strategic positioning. Director liability litigation often involves reputational risk, indemnification disputes, D&O insurance considerations, and parallel corporate claims. A structured legal response is essential.

Years of
combined
legal
experience

ME Law - Civil Litigation Law Firm

Who We Are

ME Law is a litigation-only firm handling complex shareholder and corporate disputes across Ontario, including director and officer liability claims before the Commercial List.

We represent directors, officers, shareholders, and corporations in matters involving alleged breach of fiduciary duty, misuse of corporate authority, conflict of interest disputes, and corporate opportunity diversion claims.

Our goal is clear: to protect legal standing, manage exposure, and secure proportionate outcomes grounded in statutory and appellate guidance. Whether defending directors against personal liability or advancing corporate claims on behalf of stakeholders, we bring legal precision and commercial awareness to every matter.

Click to watch video

How We Help

CIVIL LITIGATION SERVICES

Forced Share Buy-Outs & Court-Engineered Exits

When co-ownership becomes untenable, courts may impose structured exits. Forced share buy-outs and court-ordered remedies are powerful tools designed to restore fairness, finality, and enterprise stability in high-conflict shareholder disputes.

Oppression & Shareholder Claims in Insolvency

Our lawyers regularly handle disputes involving insolvent or near-insolvent corporations, including claims that overlap with bankruptcy proceedings, receiverships, CCAA restructurings, and creditor enforcement actions.

Shareholder & Partnership Arbitration Lawyers

At ME Law, we represent shareholders, partners, corporate officers, founders, and businesses of all sizes in high-stakes arbitration. We are litigation and arbitration counsel—meaning we are built for disputes, conflicts, and contested matters.

Shareholder Dispute Appeals

We regularly handle appeals involving oppression remedy findings, valuation disputes, forced share purchases, breaches of fiduciary duty, fraud and misrepresentation findings, derivative action rulings, and disputes arising from shareholder agreements.

Shareholder Oppression & Unfair Prejudice Claims

When majority shareholders or directors misuse control, suppress participation, or divert value, the consequences are not merely commercial—they are legal. Shareholder oppression claims provide a structured judicial remedy where reasonable expectations have been unfairly defeated.

Urgent Injunctions in Shareholder Disputes

When corporate control shifts overnight, shares are diluted, or assets are at risk, waiting for trial is not an option. Urgent injunctions preserve value, protect governance rights, and prevent irreversible damage in high-stakes shareholder disputes.

Why Choose Us

Premium Litigation Services:

Quality over quantity for selected clients in complex litigation matters

Selective Focus

We act for a select group of clients in high-stakes litigation, dedicating focused time and strategic attention to each matter to ensure precise, results-driven advocacy.

Limited Caseload

By limiting our caseload, we provide bespoke, high-level representation, where no detail is overlooked and every legal step is carefully considered. Quality over quantity is embedded in our ethos.

Strategic Execution

Our limited-file approach enables us to deliver thorough, strategic legal work on every matter. We don’t offer surface-level service – we provide clarity, focus, and substance.

Beyond Expectations

Our lawyers invest considerable time in legal analysis, research, and continuous training. This ongoing development allows us to stay ahead and deliver outcomes that often exceed clients’ expectations.

Clients’ Success Stories

Our cases

Hidden Assets Revealed in Estate Dispute Victory

Cross-Border Defence Win: Court Rules in Our Client’s Favor

May Elajami Secures Critical Ex Parte Interim Injunction

Strategic Mediation and Successful Defence in High-Stakes Litigation

Skillfully Navigated Personal Conflicts in Corporate Disputes

Safeguarding a Minor’s Inheritance Rights

How We Work

What To Expect

Clear and Strategic Guidance

Transparent and well-informed advice is provided to help navigate your options and achieve the best possible outcome.

Proactive Client Engagement

Clients can expect consistent communication and dedicated attention to ensure their needs are fully understood and addressed.

Meticulous Attention to Details

Every detail is carefully considered, and strategic oversight is provided to guide clients toward a favorable resolution.

Experienced. Effective. Results-Oriented.

Director and officer liability litigation strikes at the core of corporate governance. Allegations may include breach of fiduciary duty, failure to meet the statutory duty of care, misuse of corporate powers, or participation in related-party transactions that harm the corporation.

Ontario courts apply a contextual analysis. The business judgment rule affords deference where decisions are made prudently and in good faith. However, deference does not shield conduct tainted by bad faith, self-dealing, or diversion of corporate opportunity.

In oppression-based personal liability claims, courts apply the proportionality framework articulated in Wilson v. Alharayeri, ensuring that any order against an individual director is directly connected to the misconduct and is a fair and measured response.

Derivative proceedings frequently advance corporate claims for breach of fiduciary duty or conflict of interest. These matters require careful differentiation between harm to the corporation and harm to individual stakeholders.

At ME Law, we approach director and officer litigation strategically. We assess statutory obligations under section 134 of the OBCA, evaluate exposure under sections 246 and 248, and develop disciplined litigation strategies designed to protect enterprise value while resolving disputes efficiently.

Our focus remains constant: preserve value, enforce rights, and achieve commercially rational outcomes.

DIRECTOR & OFFICER LIABILITY LAWYERS YOU CAN RELY ON

We represent directors, officers, shareholders, and corporations in all forms of fiduciary duty and personal liability litigation.

These disputes demand precision and strategic foresight. Allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, conflict of interest, or misuse of corporate authority can carry serious financial and reputational consequences. Courts distinguish carefully between legitimate business judgment and conduct that justifies personal liability.

Our team combines courtroom advocacy with commercial sophistication. Whether defending directors against claims or advancing derivative or oppression-based actions, we focus on disciplined evidence, proportional remedies, and enforceable outcomes.

Our Commitment

We approach director and officer liability disputes with clarity and determination. Our role is not only to litigate allegations, but to protect reputations, manage exposure, and preserve the underlying value of the business wherever possible. At ME Law, we combine litigation skill with commercial insight to deliver strategic solutions that safeguard your position and secure fair results.

With us on your side, director and officer liability disputes can be navigated with discipline and confidence.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims

Director Duty of Care Litigation

Oppression-Based Personal Liability Claims

Defence of Directors & Officers

Conflict of Interest Disputes

Corporate Opportunity Diversion Claims

Related-Party Transaction Litigation

Misuse of Corporate Powers Allegations

Commercial List Director Litigation

Indemnification & D&O Insurance Disputes

Derivative Claims Against Directors

Governance Reform & Compliance Advisory

Clear Guidance. Strong Advocacy.

What we do:

Let us solve your legal issue

Years
Experience

0 +

Successful
Cases

0 +

Main Areas of
Specialization

0 +

Dedication to
Your Case

0 +

Reach out to us today

Frequently Asked Questions

Becoming a Client

View all faqs

How do I start?

The first step is to book a complimentary intake call with one of our intake specialists. During this initial conversation, we’ll gather some preliminary details about your matter, identify the nature of the dispute, and determine whether it falls within our areas of practice.

If we believe we can assist, we’ll then proceed with a conflict check to ensure there are no conflicts of interest under the Law Society of Ontario’s Rules of Professional Conduct. Once cleared, we can schedule a consultation with one of our lawyers, where we will review your situation in more detail, discuss potential legal strategies, and outline next steps for formal engagement.

This process ensures that every inquiry is handled carefully, ethically, and efficiently—so that we can provide you with informed guidance right from the outset.

Can you explain the typical steps involved?

Our process is designed to be clear, efficient, and transparent from start to finish.

Initial Intake Call:
We begin with a complimentary intake call to understand the general nature of your matter, confirm it falls within our areas of practice, and gather preliminary information.
Conflict Check:
Before receiving any detailed or confidential information, we conduct a conflict of interest check as required by the Law Society of Ontario. This ensures we can represent you without any professional conflicts.
Consultation with a Lawyer:
Once cleared, we schedule a formal consultation — either in person or remotely — where we review your situation in detail, answer your questions, and outline preliminary legal options or next steps.
Retainer and Engagement:
If you decide to proceed, we provide a Retainer Agreement outlining the scope of work, estimated costs, and billing structure. Upon execution and receipt of the retainer, we officially open your file.
Case Strategy and Next Steps:
Your lawyer will then prepare a strategy plan and begin working on your matter — whether that involves drafting pleadings, engaging in negotiations, or preparing for court proceedings — while keeping you informed throughout.

At every stage, we emphasize clarity, communication, and transparency so you always know what to expect and how your case is progressing.

Why is it necessary to complete a conflict check form after the initial call?

Efforts to avoid conflicts of interest are required by the Law Society of Ontario and form a fundamental part of legal ethics and professional regulation.

A conflict check ensures that our firm has never represented—or is not currently representing—any party whose interests may be adverse to yours. This process protects both you and our firm by confirming that we can act for you with full independence and loyalty.

The duty to avoid conflicts applies to past, current, and prospective clients and is set out in the Rules of Professional Conduct (the Model Code) as well as by decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada, including R. v. Neil and Canadian National Railway Co. v. McKercher LLP.

In practice, we conduct conflict checks before receiving detailed information about your matter. This step is an essential safeguard to uphold professional integrity and client trust.

How quickly can you schedule an initial call with a lawyer?

In most cases, we can schedule your consultation within 24–48 hours after completing the initial intake and conflict check process. This ensures that your matter is properly screened and assigned to the most suitable lawyer on our team.

To learn more about what happens next — from intake to engagement — please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section, where we’ve outlined each step in detail and answered the most common questions new clients have.