Confidential Information, Trade Secrets, and Restrictive Covenant Injunctions

Urgent Business-Protection Relief for Confidentiality, Trade Secret, and Post-Exit Competition Disputes

PREMIUM LEGAL SERVICES

Experienced. Aggressive. Client-Centered

Get Started

Successful Litigation Cases Handled

0 +

Litigation, Mediation, Trial - Focused

0 %

Years of Combined Legal Experience

0 +

In Handling Complicated Disputes

0 *

Why You Need Legal Help with Confidential Information, Trade Secrets, and Restrictive Covenant Injunctions

A serious trade secret injunction in Ontario is rarely about abstract contract enforcement. It is sought because a business may suffer irreversible competitive harm before the court can determine the merits. Source code may be copied, pricing and deal intelligence may be deployed, customer relationships may be targeted using internal information, departing employees may retain devices or records, and proprietary data may be used to create an unfair springboard in the market. Ontario’s court has the power to grant interlocutory injunctions and mandatory orders under s. 101 of the Courts of Justice Act, and Rule 40 supplies the motion procedure for urgent interim relief.

The legal analysis, however, is not one-size-fits-all. A confidential information injunction Ontario case is not the same as a non-solicitation injunction Ontario case, and neither is the same as a non-compete agreement Ontario dispute. Ontario now prohibits employers from entering into most employee non-compete agreements, subject to statutory exceptions, including certain sale-of-business and executive situations. That means serious counsel must distinguish sharply between protectable confidential information, enforceable non-solicitation obligations, and the narrower circumstances in which non-compete relief remains legally realistic.

For sophisticated businesses, boards, founders, investors, and acquirers, the commercial problem is immediate. Once a trade secret is used, once a customer book has been mined, or once a coordinated team departure has shifted goodwill, the damage may be difficult to quantify and difficult to unwind. That is why these disputes often require urgent, carefully tailored relief designed to preserve the competitive position until the court can rule finally. The Supreme Court’s decisions in Lac Minerals, Cadbury Schweppes, RBC Dominion Securities, Shafron, and Payette together frame the modern Canadian law of confidential information, post-exit competition, and restrictive covenants.

Years of
combined
legal
experience

ME Law - Civil Litigation Law Firm

WHO WE ARE

ME Law is a litigation-focused firm acting in urgent, high-stakes business-protection disputes across Ontario, including confidential information injunctions, trade secret injunctions, unfair competition injunctions, and restrictive covenant injunctions. We represent founders, private companies, boards, investors, strategic buyers, family offices, and other sophisticated stakeholders where the immediate risk is not merely commercial friction, but the possibility that proprietary value will be used against the business before the court can intervene effectively.

Our role is to identify what is truly protectable, what relief is genuinely available, and which remedy best fits the problem. In one matter, that may mean restraining use of confidential information or trade secrets. In another, it may mean enforcing a narrowly drawn non-solicitation covenant. In another still, it may mean seeking a mandatory injunction requiring delivery up of devices, return of records, deletion of copied materials, or restoration of access. We also act for respondents resisting overbroad injunctions, disputing whether information is truly confidential, or challenging covenants that are ambiguous, excessive, or unenforceable in light of current Ontario law.

We understand that these motions are often leverage-defining. A well-framed order can preserve the business’s confidential edge and prevent unfair competition from becoming entrenched. A poorly conceived one can fail quickly, expose the moving party to undertakings as to damages, and invite judicial skepticism. That is why we approach these disputes as serious commercial litigation: evidence first, remedy classification second, and only then urgent motion strategy.

Click to watch video

How We Help

Civil Litigation Services

Anton Piller Orders and Civil Search Relief

ME Law is a litigation-only firm with deep experience in extraordinary remedies, including Anton Piller Orders. Litigation is all we do.

Asset Preservation and Mareva Injunctions

Whether applying for or defending against a Mareva injunction, you need counsel capable of handling urgent, complex, and high-stakes litigation. At ME Law, we prepare clear, persuasive, evidence-driven applications under intense time pressure. We understand the legal thresholds, the strategic considerations, and the practical realities of asset-related disputes.

Norwich Orders and Third-Party Disclosure Relief

Whether you need to identify an unknown defendant, trace misappropriated funds, or preserve evidence before it disappears, we provide litigation-driven solutions designed to move your case forward.

Why Choose Us

Premium Litigation Services:

Quality over quantity for selected clients in complex litigation matters

Selective Focus

We act for a select group of clients in high-stakes litigation, dedicating focused time and strategic attention to each matter to ensure precise, results-driven advocacy.

Limited Caseload

By limiting our caseload, we provide bespoke, high-level representation, where no detail is overlooked and every legal step is carefully considered. Quality over quantity is embedded in our ethos.

Strategic Execution

Our limited-file approach enables us to deliver thorough, strategic legal work on every matter. We don’t offer surface-level service – we provide clarity, focus, and substance.

Beyond Expectations

Our lawyers invest considerable time in legal analysis, research, and continuous training. This ongoing development allows us to stay ahead and deliver outcomes that often exceed clients’ expectations.

Clients’ Success Stories

Our cases

Hidden Assets Revealed in Estate Dispute Victory

Cross-Border Defence Win: Court Rules in Our Client’s Favor

May Elajami Secures Critical Ex Parte Interim Injunction

Strategic Mediation and Successful Defence in High-Stakes Litigation

Skillfully Navigated Personal Conflicts in Corporate Disputes

Safeguarding a Minor’s Inheritance Rights

How We Work

What To Expect

Clear and Strategic Guidance

Transparent and well-informed advice is provided to help navigate your options and achieve the best possible outcome.

Proactive Client Engagement

Clients can expect consistent communication and dedicated attention to ensure their needs are fully understood and addressed.

Meticulous Attention to Details

Every detail is carefully considered, and strategic oversight is provided to guide clients toward a favorable resolution.

Experienced. Strategic. Results-Oriented.

The ordinary injunction framework remains the starting point. Under RJR-MacDonald, the court asks whether there is a serious issue to be tried, whether the moving party will suffer irreparable harm if relief is refused, and where the balance of convenience lies. Where the order sought is mandatory rather than merely prohibitory — for example, where the court is asked to compel delivery up, deletion, or restoration — the first-stage threshold rises to a strong prima facie case under R. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp.. In practical terms, that means a business seeking urgent corrective relief must bring a stronger merits record than a party merely seeking restraint.

Restrictive covenants bring a second layer of analysis. In Shafron, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that restrictive covenants are interpreted strictly and that ambiguity can be fatal. In Payette, the Court drew an important distinction between ordinary employment cases and the sale-of-business context, where restrictive covenants may be viewed more generously because the parties bargain from a different commercial footing. Ontario’s current Employment Standards Act adds a further statutory overlay by voiding most employee non-compete agreements, subject to the statutory exceptions. A serious restrictive covenant injunction Ontario page therefore has to be candid: not every non-compete claim is viable, but carefully drawn sale-of-business restraints, executive exceptions, non-solicitation covenants, and confidentiality obligations may still support urgent relief.

Trade-secret and confidentiality disputes also require precision about the underlying information. Lac Minerals remains foundational on breach of confidence in a commercial setting, while Cadbury Schweppes remains a leading authority on remedies for misuse of confidential information. RBC Dominion Securities is particularly important in team-move and client-relationship disputes, where the line between protectable customer connection or proprietary information and ordinary competition must be analyzed carefully. At ME Law, we act on misuse of confidential information Ontario mandates, employee departure injunction Ontario matters, customer list misuse injunction Ontario disputes, and other urgent business-protection files where the court is being asked to preserve the competitive status quo before trial.

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, TRADE SECRET, AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT LAWYERS YOU CAN RELY ON

We represent businesses, founders, directors, executives, investors, purchasers, and high-value stakeholders in trade secret injunction Ontario and confidential information injunction Ontario matters where timing, competitive position, and commercial sensitivity matter. Our team understands the practical differences between restraining misuse of proprietary information, enforcing a non-solicitation covenant, seeking delivery up of devices and documents, and testing whether a post-exit restraint is actually enforceable under current Ontario law.

These disputes are not merely about contract language. They are about whether the business can preserve the value of what it developed before that value is exploited by a former insider, competitor, buyer, seller, or departing executive. That requires disciplined affidavit evidence, a clear explanation of why the information is truly confidential or rises to the level of a trade secret, evidence of possession or threatened misuse, and a draft order that is narrow enough to preserve what matters without overreaching. It also requires defence-side sophistication where the claim confuses confidential information with general know-how, or seeks to enforce a restraint broader than the law permits.

Our Commitment
We approach confidential information, trade secrets, and restrictive covenant injunctions with urgency, restraint, and technical precision. Where immediate relief is necessary to restrain misuse, protect customer relationships, compel delivery up, or preserve legitimate commercial restraints, we move decisively. Where an injunction is unsupported, overbroad, or inconsistent with Ontario’s statutory and common-law limits, we respond immediately. At ME Law, our objective is to preserve enterprise value, protect legitimate competitive interests, and secure interim relief that is commercially intelligent and judicially sustainable.

With us on your side, these disputes can be addressed with clarity, force, and disciplined commercial-litigation strategy.

Emergency Confidential Information Injunctions

Trade Secret Misuse and Unfair Competition Injunctions

Non-Solicitation Covenant Enforcement and Defence

Sale-of-Business Non-Compete Injunctions

Executive Non-Compete and Senior Leadership Restriction Disputes

Customer List, Pricing, and Deal-Intelligence Misuse Injunctions

Source Code, Software, and Proprietary Data Protection Orders

Employee Departure, Team Lift-Out, and Springboard Injunctions

Mandatory Delivery Up, Deletion, and Return-of-Property Orders

Anton Piller / Evidence Preservation Relief in Confidentiality Cases

Shareholder, Partnership, and Founder Confidentiality Injunctions

Injunction Defence, Variation, and Set-Aside in Restrictive Covenant Cases

Clear Guidance. Strong Advocacy.

What we do:

Let us solve your legal issue

Years
Experience

0 +

Successful
Cases

0 +

Main Areas of
Specialization

0 +

Dedication to
Your Case

0 +

Reach out to us today

Frequently Asked Questions

Becoming a Client

View all faqs

How do I start?

The first step is to book a complimentary intake call with one of our intake specialists. During this initial conversation, we’ll gather some preliminary details about your matter, identify the nature of the dispute, and determine whether it falls within our areas of practice.

If we believe we can assist, we’ll then proceed with a conflict check to ensure there are no conflicts of interest under the Law Society of Ontario’s Rules of Professional Conduct. Once cleared, we can schedule a consultation with one of our lawyers, where we will review your situation in more detail, discuss potential legal strategies, and outline next steps for formal engagement.

This process ensures that every inquiry is handled carefully, ethically, and efficiently—so that we can provide you with informed guidance right from the outset.

Can you explain the typical steps involved?

Our process is designed to be clear, efficient, and transparent from start to finish.

Initial Intake Call:
We begin with a complimentary intake call to understand the general nature of your matter, confirm it falls within our areas of practice, and gather preliminary information.
Conflict Check:
Before receiving any detailed or confidential information, we conduct a conflict of interest check as required by the Law Society of Ontario. This ensures we can represent you without any professional conflicts.
Consultation with a Lawyer:
Once cleared, we schedule a formal consultation — either in person or remotely — where we review your situation in detail, answer your questions, and outline preliminary legal options or next steps.
Retainer and Engagement:
If you decide to proceed, we provide a Retainer Agreement outlining the scope of work, estimated costs, and billing structure. Upon execution and receipt of the retainer, we officially open your file.
Case Strategy and Next Steps:
Your lawyer will then prepare a strategy plan and begin working on your matter — whether that involves drafting pleadings, engaging in negotiations, or preparing for court proceedings — while keeping you informed throughout.

At every stage, we emphasize clarity, communication, and transparency so you always know what to expect and how your case is progressing.

Why is it necessary to complete a conflict check form after the initial call?

Efforts to avoid conflicts of interest are required by the Law Society of Ontario and form a fundamental part of legal ethics and professional regulation.

A conflict check ensures that our firm has never represented—or is not currently representing—any party whose interests may be adverse to yours. This process protects both you and our firm by confirming that we can act for you with full independence and loyalty.

The duty to avoid conflicts applies to past, current, and prospective clients and is set out in the Rules of Professional Conduct (the Model Code) as well as by decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada, including R. v. Neil and Canadian National Railway Co. v. McKercher LLP.

In practice, we conduct conflict checks before receiving detailed information about your matter. This step is an essential safeguard to uphold professional integrity and client trust.

How quickly can you schedule an initial call with a lawyer?

In most cases, we can schedule your consultation within 24–48 hours after completing the initial intake and conflict check process. This ensures that your matter is properly screened and assigned to the most suitable lawyer on our team.

To learn more about what happens next — from intake to engagement — please visit our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section, where we’ve outlined each step in detail and answered the most common questions new clients have.

What clients say about us

Reviews &
Testimonials

Facing a Legal Challenge?

Take control of the situation with expert legal advice. Contact us today to explore your best options and protect your interests.

Start now

Injunctions

SEE ALL

Articles