Defending a Civil Claim

Strategic Representation for Defendants Facing Civil and Commercial Lawsuits in Ontario

PREMIUM LEGAL SERVICES

Experienced. Aggressive. Client-Centered

Get Started

Successful Litigation Cases Handled

0 +

Litigation, Mediation, Trial - Focused

0 %

Years of Combined Legal Experience

0 +

In Handling Complicated Disputes

0 *

Why You Need Legal Help When Defending a Civil Claim

Being sued in Ontario requires more than answering allegations in a statement of claim. Early decisions can affect jurisdiction, deadlines, evidence, settlement leverage, costs exposure, claims involving other parties, and the overall Ontario civil litigation strategy.

Under Rule 18 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant served in Ontario generally has 20 days to deliver a statement of defence. A defendant served elsewhere in Canada or in the United States generally has 40 days, while a defendant served elsewhere generally has 60 days. A timely Notice of Intent to Defend provides an additional 10 days.

Before delivering either document, a defendant served outside Ontario should determine whether jurisdiction, service outside Ontario, or forum is genuinely disputed. A Rule 17.06 challenge should be assessed before delivering a defence, Notice of Intent to Defend, or notice of appearance.

If the defence deadline expires, Rule 19.01 permits delivery of a defence before the defendant is noted in default. Once noted in default, however, the defendant is generally deemed to admit the factual allegations and loses the ordinary ability to defend or take further steps except as permitted by the Rules, consent, or leave.

Default does not itself establish that the plaintiff is legally entitled to judgment; the pleaded and deemed-admitted facts must still support the relief claimed. If default judgment has already been obtained, a motion to set aside or vary the judgment under Rule 19.08 may be required. ME Law’s Setting Aside a Default Judgment service addresses that separate position.

A statement of defence should not consist of blanket denials. Rule 25.07 requires the defendant to admit facts that are not disputed, deny contested allegations, and plead the defendant’s own material version of events where it differs from the plaintiff’s account. Affirmative defences must also be pleaded where failing to do so could take the plaintiff by surprise or introduce an issue not already raised.

For someone served with a statement of claim in Ontario, the defence strategy should follow a disciplined sequence:

Service → Jurisdiction → Deadline → Claims → Material Facts → Defences → Evidence → Other Claims & Parties → Procedural Strategy → Settlement or Trial

The pleading must be tested against the evidence. Contracts, correspondence, corporate records, accounting information, transaction documents, board materials, electronic communications, and insurance policies may strengthen or undermine the proposed defence. Relevant documents and electronically stored information should be identified and preserved early, with privilege protected during internal investigations and communications with counsel.

A defendant should also determine whether the defence represents the entire litigation position. A counterclaim may advance an independent claim against the plaintiff; a crossclaim may address responsibility involving an existing co-defendant; and a third-party claim may be available against a non-party under Rule 29. These procedures are distinct and may involve specific timing requirements.

For commercial defendants, the lawsuit may also affect insurance, contractual indemnities, financing relationships, disclosure obligations, management time, reputation, parallel proceedings, and ongoing business relationships.

The central question is not simply how to answer the statement of claim. It is how to build the strongest sustainable defence before early procedural decisions narrow the available options.

Years of
combined
legal
experience

ME Law - Civil Litigation Law Firm

WHO WE ARE

ME Law is a litigation-only firm representing defendants in complex Ontario civil and commercial litigation.

We act for businesses, shareholders, executives, investors, financial institutions, professionals, estates, property owners, lenders, and other sophisticated parties facing significant financial, ownership, contractual, operational, or reputational exposure.

Our work begins with the proceeding as served. We identify the relief claimed, causes of action, material allegations, deadlines, jurisdictional issues, available defences, evidentiary record, potential claims involving other parties, and the procedural steps required to protect the client’s position.

The statement of defence is developed within that broader strategy. Where the plaintiff’s account is disputed, we identify the material facts the defendant intends to establish and plead affirmative defences with the precision required by the Rules.

We also assess whether counterclaims, crossclaims, or third-party proceedings should form part of the litigation. Each route serves a different purpose and must fit the parties, underlying transactions, and relief genuinely in issue.

Where appropriate, the strategy may include requests for particulars, jurisdictional challenges, motions directed at legally deficient claims, summary judgment motions where the Rule 20 test can be satisfied, evidence preservation, or settlement initiatives.

Our focus is to identify what matters early, preserve available positions, and build the litigation around a realistic legal and commercial objective.

Click to watch video

How We Help

Civil Litigation Services

Civil Litigation Lawyers

Civil litigation is the formal legal process used to resolve disputes between individuals, businesses, or other entities.

Costs Awards & Cost Recovery

A costs award can materially affect the economic result of Ontario civil litigation. Courts have broad discretion over entitlement, scale, and amount, while Rule 49 offers can create significant costs consequences. ME Law represents parties seeking to recover legal costs and parties resisting substantial or disproportionate costs claims.

Discovery & Documentary Production

Discovery can determine what evidence is available, what admissions can be obtained, which issues remain genuinely disputed, and whether an Ontario civil case should proceed to motion, settlement, or trial. ME Law represents businesses and sophisticated parties in documentary discovery, examinations for discovery, production disputes, undertakings, refusals, and related evidentiary strategy.

Limitation Periods & Time-Barred Claims

Ontario’s Limitations Act, 2002 generally imposes a two-year basic limitation period running from discovery of a claim. Determining when a claim was legally discovered, however, can require careful analysis of what the claimant knew or reasonably ought to have known and when a proceeding became an appropriate means to seek a remedy. For many claims, Ontario law also imposes a 15-year ultimate limitation period, subject to statutory exceptions, exclusions, and special rules that can materially affect whether litigation remains available.

Setting Aside a Default Judgment

A default judgment can materially alter a party’s litigation position before the underlying dispute has been decided on a contested record. Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure permit a court to set aside or vary a default judgment on terms that are just. The outcome depends on the procedural history, explanation for default, timing of the motion, proposed defence, prejudice to the parties, and the broader interests of justice. Subheading: Strategic Representation in Motions to Set Aside Default Judgments in Ontario

Summary Judgment Motions

Summary judgment can resolve all or part of an Ontario civil proceeding without a conventional trial where there is no genuine issue requiring a trial. Rule 20 gives judges enhanced fact-finding powers, including the ability to weigh evidence, evaluate credibility, and draw reasonable inferences where their use is consistent with the interests of justice. Whether summary judgment is appropriate depends on the issues, evidentiary record, proportionality, and whether the dispute can be fairly and justly determined without trial.

Why Choose Us

Premium Litigation Services:

Quality over quantity for selected clients in complex litigation matters

Selective Focus

We act for a select group of clients in high-stakes litigation, dedicating focused time and strategic attention to each matter to ensure precise, results-driven advocacy.

Limited Caseload

By limiting our caseload, we provide bespoke, high-level representation, where no detail is overlooked and every legal step is carefully considered. Quality over quantity is embedded in our ethos.

Strategic Execution

Our limited-file approach enables us to deliver thorough, strategic legal work on every matter. We don’t offer surface-level service – we provide clarity, focus, and substance.

Beyond Expectations

Our lawyers invest considerable time in legal analysis, research, and continuous training. This ongoing development allows us to stay ahead and deliver outcomes that often exceed clients’ expectations.

Clients’ Success Stories

Our cases

Strategic Commercial Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

Securing a $50M+ Mareva Injunction for a Silicon Valley Startup

Strategic Resolution of $5M+ Shareholder Disputes Across Litigation and Arbitration

Strategic Resolution of $20M Corporate Dispute and $8M+ Estate Succession Matter

Strategic Litigation Leadership in a $15M+ Corporate and Family Dispute

Securing a $2M+ Property Interest After an 8-Day Civil Trial

How We Work

What To Expect

Clear and Strategic Guidance

Transparent and well-informed advice is provided to help navigate your options and achieve the best possible outcome.

Proactive Client Engagement

Clients can expect consistent communication and dedicated attention to ensure their needs are fully understood and addressed.

Meticulous Attention to Details

Every detail is carefully considered, and strategic oversight is provided to guide clients toward a favorable resolution.

Experienced. Effective. Results-Oriented.

Defending a civil lawsuit should be approached as a litigation strategy, not as a series of reactions to the plaintiff’s timetable.

At ME Law, our analysis follows a structured sequence:

Claim → Jurisdiction → Liability → Defences → Evidence → Damages → Other Responsible Parties → Procedural Options → Settlement → Trial Position

We begin with what the plaintiff must establish. Each cause of action has legal and factual requirements, and the defence should test whether those elements are properly pleaded and capable of proof on the anticipated evidence.

We distinguish material disputes from facts that should properly be admitted. A disciplined defence focuses on issues that can change liability, causation, damages, available relief, or the client’s overall position rather than contesting every allegation for tactical effect.

Damages are assessed separately. Even where liability risk exists, quantum may depend on causation, mitigation, remoteness, contractual limitations, valuation methodology, contributory negligence where applicable, and the quality of the plaintiff’s evidence.

We also consider whether responsibility extends beyond the named defendant. Contractual indemnities, guarantees, multiple contracting parties, shareholders, joint ventures, advisers, subcontractors, and other relationships may affect how risk should ultimately be allocated.

Procedural choices follow from that analysis. Some cases should proceed through discovery, expert evidence, and trial; others may contain a discrete issue suitable for earlier determination. Motions should be used where they can dispose of an issue, narrow the dispute, preserve a right, or materially improve the client’s position.

Settlement is assessed with the same discipline. Liability risk, damages exposure, evidentiary strengths and weaknesses, legal costs, commercial disruption, enforcement implications, and potential costs awards and cost recovery should inform meaningful settlement positions.

Where settlement is appropriate, its structure may also need to address confidentiality, releases, contribution or indemnity rights, insurance interests, enforceability, and finality.

CIVIL DEFENCE LAWYERS YOU CAN RELY ON

ME Law represents defendants from the initial response to a civil claim through pleadings, motions, discovery, settlement, trial, and related appeal strategy where required.

For a defendant recently served with a statement of claim, the immediate priority is to stabilize the litigation position: identify any jurisdictional or service issue that must be addressed before a responsive document is delivered, confirm the deadline, preserve relevant evidence, and determine the required procedural step.

We then build the substantive defence by assessing the causes of action, reconstructing the material chronology, reviewing the documentary record, identifying witnesses, evaluating factual and legal defences, testing the plaintiff’s damages case, and determining whether counterclaims, crossclaims, or third-party proceedings should be advanced.

Third-party issues require early attention because Rule 29 contains specific procedural and timing requirements. Potential contribution, indemnity, or related liability should therefore be considered before the litigation structure becomes difficult to change.

As the evidence develops, the strategy evolves. Documentary production, examinations for discovery, admissions, expert evidence, motions, and settlement offers may materially change the assessment of liability, quantum, settlement value, and litigation risk.

For a business seeking to defend a civil lawsuit in Toronto or elsewhere in Ontario, the legal merits are only part of the analysis. A technically successful defence may still produce a poor commercial result if it generates disproportionate cost, consumes management resources, disrupts operations, ignores insurance or indemnity rights, or overlooks a rational resolution.

Our Commitment

Our objective is not simply to file a statement of defence. It is to place the client in the strongest sustainable position to defeat, narrow, resolve, or manage the claim while protecting procedural rights and broader legal and commercial interests.

We combine procedural discipline, evidentiary strategy, commercial judgment, and focused litigation advocacy throughout the defence of Ontario civil and commercial claims.

If you have been served with a statement of claim—or anticipate a civil lawsuit—Contact ME Law to assess the defence strategy before procedural deadlines or early litigation decisions limit the available options.

Defence of Civil and Commercial Claims

Defence of Contract and Commercial Disputes

Defence of Shareholder, Partnership and Joint Venture Claims

Defence of Civil Fraud, Misrepresentation and Business-Tort Claims

Defence of Negligence and Professional Liability Claims

Defence of Construction and Real Estate Disputes

Defence of Commercial Lease and Co-Ownership Claims

Defence of Insurance Coverage and Financial Claims

Defence of Injunctions and Urgent Court Proceedings

Defence of Securities, Franchise and Business-Operation Disputes

Summary Judgment and Early Disposition Strategy

Counterclaims, Third-Party Proceedings, Settlement, Trial and Costs Strategy

Clear Guidance. Strong Advocacy.

What we do:

Let us solve your legal issue

Years
Experience

0 +

Successful
Cases

0 +

Main Areas of
Specialization

0 +

Dedication to
Your Case

0 +

Reach out to us today

Frequently Asked Questions

Becoming a Client

View all faqs

How do I become a client of ME Law?

Becoming a client of ME Law begins with a complimentary intake call and proceeds through a conflict check, a formal consultation with a lawyer, and, if you decide to retain the firm and ME Law agrees to act, a written Retainer Agreement. Once the agreement is executed and the required retainer is received, ME Law opens the file and begins the agreed legal work.

The first step is the initial intake call. This is a preliminary conversation with an intake specialist, not the substantive legal consultation itself. The purpose is to understand the general nature of your matter, identify the type of dispute involved, gather preliminary information, and determine whether the matter falls within ME Law’s areas of practice.

At this stage, the firm is screening the matter so that the appropriate next step can be identified. If the matter appears to be one ME Law may be able to assist with, the process moves to a conflict check before detailed legal advice is provided.

If you want to understand why that step is required, see Why is a conflict check necessary before a consultation?.

The conflict check is conducted to determine whether ME Law has a professional conflict that would prevent the firm from acting. The process is governed by the Law Society of Ontario professional obligations and is intended to protect confidentiality, independence, and loyalty. You may be asked to identify the relevant parties so that those names can be checked against the firm’s records.

Once the conflict check is cleared, the next stage is a formal consultation with a lawyer. This is different from the preliminary intake call. The consultation is the substantive meeting in which the lawyer reviews your situation in more detail, answers questions, discusses preliminary legal options and strategy, and explains what the next steps may look like.

For a fuller explanation of the meeting itself, see What is a consultation at ME Law?.

The onboarding process can therefore be understood in five stages:

Initial intake call.
ME Law gathers preliminary information, identifies the nature of the matter, and determines whether it falls within the firm’s practice areas.
Conflict check.
The relevant party names are reviewed to determine whether a conflict of interest prevents ME Law from proceeding.
Consultation with a lawyer.
Once cleared, you meet with a lawyer, either in person or remotely, for a more detailed assessment of the matter and the legal options that may be available.
Retainer and engagement.
If you decide to proceed and ME Law agrees to take on the matter, the firm provides a Retainer Agreement setting out the scope of work, estimated costs, and billing structure. The scope is defined according to the work that is actually required rather than assumed to cover every possible step in the dispute.
File opening and legal work.
Once the Retainer Agreement is executed and the required retainer is received, the file is formally opened. The lawyer can then begin the agreed work, which may include developing a case strategy, drafting pleadings, engaging in negotiations, or preparing for court proceedings, depending on the mandate.

Becoming a client is therefore not the same thing as making an inquiry or completing an intake call. It also does not occur merely because a consultation has been booked. The formal engagement stage matters because it defines what ME Law has agreed to do, how the work will be billed, and what the client and firm should expect from the relationship.

The consultation is also where the proposed scope of the engagement can be discussed. Depending on the matter, that may involve advice on a defined issue through a limited-scope retainer or broader ongoing representation through a full-scope retainer. The appropriate structure depends on the record, complexity, procedural stage, and work required.

If your matter is urgent, explain that during the intake process so the firm can assess timing and lawyer availability. See How quickly can you schedule an initial consultation? for how consultation scheduling is handled after intake and conflict clearance.

ME Law’s onboarding process is designed to move from preliminary screening to conflict clearance, substantive legal assessment, and then a clearly defined engagement. The purpose is to ensure that the firm understands the matter, can act without a professional conflict, and has agreed with you on the scope of the work before substantive representation begins.

Contact ME Law to start the intake process and discuss whether your matter is one the firm may be able to assist with.

What are the typical steps from first contact to retaining ME Law?

The process typically moves through five stages: an initial intake call, a conflict check, a consultation with a lawyer, a formal Retainer Agreement, and then file opening and the start of the agreed legal work. Each stage has a different purpose, so contacting ME Law does not automatically mean that the firm has been retained.

1. Initial intake call

The process begins with a complimentary intake call. An intake specialist gathers preliminary information about the dispute, identifies the parties involved, and considers whether the matter falls within ME Law’s areas of practice.

This is an initial screening step rather than the substantive legal consultation. If you want the broader overview of becoming a client, see How do I become a client of ME Law?.

2. Conflict check

If the matter is potentially suitable for the firm, ME Law conducts a conflict check before moving into substantive discussions. Relevant party names are checked against the firm’s records to determine whether professional obligations prevent ME Law from acting.

For more detail on the purpose of this step, see Why is a conflict check necessary before a consultation?.

3. Consultation with a lawyer

Once the conflict check is cleared, a formal consultation can be scheduled. The consultation may take place in person or remotely and is the stage at which the lawyer reviews the matter in greater depth, discusses preliminary legal options and strategy, and considers what further work may be required.

This is distinct from the initial intake call. What is a consultation at ME Law? explains the scope of that substantive meeting in more detail.

4. Retainer and engagement

If you decide to proceed and ME Law agrees to accept the mandate, the firm provides a written Retainer Agreement. It identifies the agreed scope of work, billing structure, and other terms governing the engagement.

Depending on the matter, the engagement may be structured as a limited-scope retainer for defined work or as broader ongoing representation. The lawyer-client engagement begins according to the terms of the executed retainer rather than merely because an inquiry or consultation has taken place.

5. File opening and next steps

After the Retainer Agreement is executed and any required retainer funds are received, ME Law can formally open the file and begin the work within the agreed mandate.

Depending on the dispute, that work may include developing litigation strategy, reviewing evidence, drafting pleadings, engaging in negotiations, or preparing for proceedings before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

The purpose of this staged process is to ensure that the matter is screened appropriately, conflicts are addressed, the legal issues are assessed, and both the client and ME Law understand the scope of the engagement before substantive representation begins.

Contact ME Law to begin the intake process.

What information do I need to provide for a conflict check after the initial call?

After the initial intake call, ME Law will ask you to identify the parties involved in your matter so the firm can complete a conflict check before receiving detailed confidential information or moving to a substantive consultation. The purpose at this stage is to establish who is involved, not to conduct a full review of your case.

The conflict check is part of ME Law’s intake and onboarding process. Before a lawyer can proceed with substantive discussions, the firm must determine whether it currently represents, previously represented, or holds confidential information relating to a party whose interests may conflict with yours.

ME Law’s conflict-check obligations arise under the Law Society of Ontario’s Rules of Professional Conduct and form part of the professional duties governing independence, loyalty, and confidentiality.

If you want a fuller explanation of the legal and ethical reason for this process, see Why is a conflict check necessary before a consultation?.

What should you provide?

At this stage, you should provide the names of the relevant parties involved in the dispute or proposed engagement. The objective is to give ME Law enough identifying information to run the appropriate check against its records.

Depending on the matter, there may be several parties whose involvement needs to be identified before the conflict check can be completed. The important point is to disclose the relevant party names accurately so the firm can determine whether a professional conflict exists.

You generally should not use the conflict-check stage to send a large volume of confidential documents or provide an extensive substantive account of the dispute before ME Law confirms that it is able to proceed. The conflict check comes before the detailed legal assessment.

The typical sequence is:

Initial intake call — ME Law gathers preliminary information about the nature of the matter.
Party identification — you provide the names required for the conflict check.
Conflict review — ME Law checks its records for potential professional conflicts.
Conflict clearance — if no conflict prevents the firm from proceeding, the matter can move to the next stage.
Consultation — detailed documents, facts, legal issues, strategy, and possible next steps can then be addressed through the substantive consultation process.

This distinction is important because completing a conflict-check form does not itself create a retainer or mean that ME Law has agreed to represent you. It is a preliminary professional safeguard within the intake process.

For the broader onboarding sequence, see How do I become a client of ME Law?. Once the conflict process is complete, What is a consultation at ME Law? explains what happens at the substantive legal assessment stage.

Contact ME Law to begin the intake process and provide the party information required for a conflict check.

What happens during the initial intake call with ME Law?

The initial intake call is a complimentary preliminary conversation with an ME Law intake specialist. Its purpose is to understand the general nature of your matter, gather the information needed to assess whether it falls within the firm’s areas of practice, identify the relevant parties, and determine the appropriate next step.

The intake call is different from a substantive consultation with a lawyer. At this stage, ME Law is not conducting a detailed review of your evidence or providing a full legal assessment. Instead, the firm is gathering enough preliminary information to determine whether the matter is one it may be able to assist with and what must happen before a consultation can proceed.

For an overview of the complete onboarding process, see How do I become a client of ME Law?.

During the initial intake process, you may be asked to explain:

the general nature of the dispute;
who the relevant parties are;
whether litigation or another legal proceeding has already started;
whether there are immediate deadlines or urgent circumstances;
what type of assistance you are seeking from ME Law.

Identifying the parties is particularly important because the next step will ordinarily involve a conflict check under the Law Society of Ontario’s professional-conduct requirements. ME Law must determine whether a professional conflict prevents the firm from proceeding before receiving detailed confidential information or moving into substantive legal discussions.

For the practical information required at that stage, see What information do I need to provide for a conflict check after the initial call?.

Once the conflict check is completed and the firm is able to proceed, a formal consultation with a lawyer can be scheduled. That consultation is where the matter can be examined in greater depth, including the factual record, legal issues, preliminary strategy, and possible next steps.

The distinction matters: an intake call, a conflict check, a substantive legal consultation, and a Retainer Agreement are separate stages of the client-onboarding process. Completing the intake call does not by itself mean that ME Law has agreed to act or that a lawyer-client retainer has been established.

If you want to know how quickly the substantive lawyer meeting can be arranged after intake and conflict clearance, see How quickly can you schedule an initial consultation?.

Contact ME Law to begin the intake process.