In oppression law, the claimant must identify expectations that were both actually held and objectively reasonable in the circumstances, then show they were violated by oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, or unfairly disregarding conduct. The Supreme Court in BCE treated this as a contextual inquiry tied to commercial reality, and Wilson reaffirmed that this two-part structure remains the framework for oppression analysis.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are “reasonable expectations,” and why do they matter?
What we do
Our Services
+ Receivership, Insolvency and Bankruptcy LitigationReceivership, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Litigation
Let us solve your legal issue
- intake@melaw.ca
- (416) 923-0003
Years
Experience
0
+
Successful
Cases
0
+
Main Areas of
Specialization
0
+
Dedication to
Your Case
0
+
Reach out to us today
- We will review your case
- Evaluate your options
- Provide tailored solutions
- Develop a strategic plan
- Protect your business interests